See?? I promise I am back, and so is Spangled!! Legend isn’t so happy another Steve muse is about and Spangled wants to beat up this new Steve and throw him out a window, but I’m handling it!! >w<
List of those who want to rp;
I am going to re-do this..It’s been so long since then, might as well start fresh with that?
- fatherofinvention; 1, 2
americaslivinglegend replied to your post “A list of really good AUs [[MOR] suicidal patient/therapist…”*coughHowardissinandsteebisvirtuecough* *coughandhowardcorruptsvirtuecoughcoughcoughimeanwhat?*
You sound a little under the weather, Cap.
Need a glass of water?
I um..I’m fine. *whistles innocently.*
As I wrote about earlier, California’s Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) has ordered California’s health plans to remove exclusions of coverage based on gender identity and expression. Kaiser is the first I’ve seen to release more information about what they are specifically doing in response to these changes.
I couldn’t get my hands on an official document or website that outlines these changes, but I have been speaking with a couple of Kaiser representatives who have been answering my questions about the latest developments re: Kaiser and surgeries/treatments for transgender individuals. Part of this comes from an internal Kaiser document, so I did not post it in its entirety.
Here are the main points:
What other KP lines of business include transgender benefits?
Which plans and market segments are not in scope for transgender benefits at this time?
What travel and lodging is covered as part of the transgender benefits?
The travel and lodging is covered for:
Are other states taking similar action?
Southern California Contact: Anna Pitinyan firstname.lastname@example.org.
Northern California Contact: Terri Hupfer Terri.Hupfer@
Not sure what your insurance company is doing about this? Call them! Ask them how their policies have changed and what procedures are now covered. Please, let me know what you find out at tandotherapy@.
Update 8/1/13: Matt Wood of the Transgender Law Center offers further explanation and clarification:
Kaiser is an insurer, and as such it offers a variety of plans. It’s important to help people understand the difference between a plan and an insurer. In the past, certain plans included care for SRS, and certain ones didn’t. So people used to call me and ask if they should insure themselves with Kaiser or Blue Cross, because they heard Kaiser offered trans care. The truth of the matter was that all insurers offered all care – it just depended upon what plan you or your employer contracted for. We have argued all along the while exclusions themselves weren’t unlawful, those based upon gender identity were. The problem was that Kaiser and other insurers had exclusions that were worded as if they solely applied to trans people (“no care related to transsexualism”) as opposed to exclusions based upon procedures (“no hysterectomies”).
As a result, the DMHC issued its letter saying that all medical care that is medically necessary for gender transition and that is available to non-trans people cannot be excluded. There’s no distinction between MTF and FTM care, or bottom and top surgery. All *could* be covered, depending upon a person’s unique medical circumstances. But we’re hearing right now that they don’t want to do any trans related surgeries for people with plans that formerly had exclusions until they have received more information from DMHC. We’re not sure why this is. We expect to get more clarification within 6 months, but that is a huge burden for many people with HMOs, not just Kaiser.
Medi-cal is different. Medi-cal is a federal program administered by states at the county level. Medi-Cal has never excluded transition-related care (top, bottom surgery or HRT). However, depending upon which provider the county contracted with, that provider might have been misinformed and told a person there was an exclusion. Some people have Medi-Cal through HMOs. Some have it through fee for service (find their own doctor who accepts and get reimbursed). The affordable care act will make it more likely that people will have HMOs. Some counties contract with Kaiser (esp here in the Bay Area). But other counties don’t. But Exclusions don’t now, and haven’t in the past, been a legal barrier to care. Barriers have been ignorance of providers and lack of available providers (those that accept medi-cal reimbursement rates, which are supposedly among the lowest in the nation).
The Director’s letter applies to *all* HMOs, not just to Kaiser, as well as to all plans – including those offered by employers and schools, as well as those purchased by individuals. The only exception is that it does not apply to HMO plans that are offered by companies that are to “self-insured.” Many large companies are self insured, so check your plan carefully. If your company is self-insured and offers an HMO plan, it is not subject to the Director’s letter.
What this means:
1) An HMO cannot deny to a transgender patient the same medical procedure it covers for a non-transgender person. So if an HMO will cover a non-trans person’s hormone therapy for some medical reason, it must cover hormone therapy related to gender transitions for trans people. Similarly, if an HMO offers genital surgery to a non-trans person for some reason, it cannot deny it to a transgender person who seeks it as part of their treatment for gender dysphoria/GID.
2) HMOs are not required to cover all types of transition-related care. Rather, they are required treat trans and non-trans people the same in the provision of covered care. So, for example, if an HMO does not provide coverage for a hysterectomy for a non-trans woman, then it does not have to provide coverage for a hysterectomy for a transman based upon his gender transition.
3) HMOs offer “managed care” and a primary way they save costs is by contracting with specific physicians and surgeons. These medical professionals then become part of the HMO’s “network.” As a result, if the HMO already has someone in network who can perform top surgery or GRS, then you must use that in-network provider. If you want to go to a specific surgeon that you choose, ask them first if they are part of the HMO’s network. If they are not and you still want to go to them, you’ll have to pay for the procedure out-of-pocket. In some rare cases, as deemed appropriate by the HMO and based upon a person’s unique medical circumstances, the HMO may choose to cover medical care by a provider who is not in its network.
4) Finally, there is still much confusion about what the Director’s letter means, and we are aware of transpeople who are still being denied covered care by HMOs. If this happens to you, please contact the Transgender Law Center at 415-865-0176 x306 or online at: http://transgenderlawcenter.org/help“
To read the Director’s letter and learn more, go to TLC’s website -http://transgenderlawcenter.org/archives/4273
Source of information (x)